• If you are having any problems posting threads plz message Kate. since latest update we have had 6 members with problems, sorted those but yet to find the problem.

XXX Merged to be Deleted

Status
Not open for further replies.
The integrity of PG is slowly going down the drain. There's been an increasing number of ads with severely enhanced photos of late.

There is also an increasing number of WLs who I would consider to be time wasters, perhaps there needs to be a separate post for this. There is absolutely no respect for the punter's time.
 
Just to clear the air here a bit......

1. The PG website is an advertising site in which private/independant WLs pay to advertise themselves. There is no employment/contractor relationship between the WLs and PG.

2. The services provided by the WLs are at the sole discretion of the WL. PG has no input as to the service, costs etc etc.

3. If a punter has a problem with a WL, it's a matter between him and the WL. PG will re-consider a WL's advert if it appears that a WL maybe doing something immoral or illegal.

4. If a WL is providing a poor service, she will have a problem. Word will get around like on this forum and her bookings will be affected. However, as has been said many times, what one punter thinks is poor service, to another punter the service is fine.....it's all about chemistry!

5. The PG website owner phyiscally meets with the Perth based WLs or those who are touring Perth. When she is satisfied that the WL is who she says she is, then the ***Images Verified - Web Owner*** is added to the WL's profile.

6. In relation to those WLs who the website owner has not phyiscally met, ie the WL is based over east and does not tour Perth, there is another mode of verification. If one or two may slip through the process, their advert will be re-considered.

7. The pics posted on a WL's profile tend to be glamour shots. It has to be expected that a WL may not look a 100% like those of her in these shots. We are human and have our good/bad days.

8. As for Kitty's profile, please note that there are 3 WLs on the PG site who use the name "Kitty" so it may be possible to confuse these WLs. Please note that PG has no input into a WL's "working name".

By way of disclosure, I have an involvement with PG. That involvement does not extend to meeting the WLs (sometimes I may do) or monitor/manage the website.

Fudd :)
 
Re: Review Alicia Privategirls

Spewin!! Just had a look on the PG link and she's smokin. So often, as you all know, bit of the ol bait-and-switch with glamorous pics like that.
As far as price goes, yeah well, supply and demand. If we keep the forum alive and kicking we can have a better say in which of our many lovely girls get supported. Personally, looks are a bonus, it's the service I'm after. If I can have a great time - which is sooo dependent on the WL enjoying her time as well - then $400 for a commensurate service? No problem. I'm sure I'm not alone here, but part of the service is forgetting it's a service and so the exchange of coin becomes part of the background noise.
 
Re: Paige Michaels

I'd be a little dubious of those pics dude. I know the face is blurred but I'm thinking, the hair, tits and tan just instantly reminded me of Amy Reid (I think that's her name) a porn star from USA.
Pics may be an excellent likeness even if it's not Ms Michaels herself. Could always ask. There is a program you can find on net that tracks origins of pics I believe. I read of it when people were talking about another site which is notorious for fake pics.
 
Re: Paige Michaels

She doesn't appear on the TinEye sight like many of the BC girls Thats a good start
But she is gorgeous for$250 Maybe to good to be true?
 
Re: Paige Michaels

Not only that, there is no phone number advertised which always gets my scam detector kicking into gear!!
 
Re: Paige Michaels

Thanks Fudd shouldn't have been so rude Should have put up the site for tineye myself
All punters should have it We need all the help we can get. If we dont use in person services like Langtrees or Well known and respected Privates
 
Fudd said:
Just to clear the air here a bit......

1. The PG website is an advertising site in which private/independant WLs pay to advertise themselves. There is no employment/contractor relationship between the WLs and PG.

2. The services provided by the WLs are at the sole discretion of the WL. PG has no input as to the service, costs etc etc.

3. If a punter has a problem with a WL, it's a matter between him and the WL. PG will re-consider a WL's advert if it appears that a WL maybe doing something immoral or illegal.

4. If a WL is providing a poor service, she will have a problem. Word will get around like on this forum and her bookings will be affected. However, as has been said many times, what one punter thinks is poor service, to another punter the service is fine.....it's all about chemistry!

5. The PG website owner phyiscally meets with the Perth based WLs or those who are touring Perth. When she is satisfied that the WL is who she says she is, then the ***Images Verified - Web Owner*** is added to the WL's profile.

6. In relation to those WLs who the website owner has not phyiscally met, ie the WL is based over east and does not tour Perth, there is another mode of verification. If one or two may slip through the process, their advert will be re-considered.

7. The pics posted on a WL's profile tend to be glamour shots. It has to be expected that a WL may not look a 100% like those of her in these shots. We are human and have our good/bad days.

8. As for Kitty's profile, please note that there are 3 WLs on the PG site who use the name "Kitty" so it may be possible to confuse these WLs. Please note that PG has no input into a WL's "working name".

By way of disclosure, I have an involvement with PG. That involvement does not extend to meeting the WLs (sometimes I may do) or monitor/manage the website.

Fudd :)
Click to expand...


So, if the girl's profile has ***Images Verified - Web Owner***, that would mean the photos are not fake, as the web owner, has met the WL? However, one of the posters in this thread, said he had met the WL and said her photo's were fake? confused
 
asianguy77 said:
So, if the girl's profile has ***Images Verified - Web Owner***, that would mean the photos are not fake, as the web owner, has met the WL? However, one of the posters in this thread, said he had met the WL and said her photo's were fake? confused
Click to expand...

....am unsure as to the basis for the claim that the pics were fake. However, if a punter is of the belief that a WL's pics are fake, I would suggest that this be brought to PG's attention by email - info@privategirls.com.au so that the matter can be reviewed. It is not in PG's interest to knowingly publish fake pics.

Fudd :)
 
Fudd said:
....am unsure as to the basis for the claim that the pics were fake. However, if a punter is of the belief that a WL's pics are fake, I would suggest that this be brought to PG's attention by email - info@privategirls.com.au so that the matter can be reviewed. It is not in PG's interest to knowingly publish fake pics.

Fudd :)
Click to expand...

Haha, I know Fudd's connection to Private Girls. He is the PI :)
:notworthy sniffs out the fakes
 
Demon said:
:laughing4Yes:laughing4
Click to expand...

Shaven and trimmed, no hair around private parts. Body smelling fresh and dont forget a nice aftershave. No smelly breath, please clean your teeth and use mouthwash. Ears and noose trimmed as well. :la:
 
Re: Paige Michaels

I believe I have established email contact with this girl. Asked for a phone number. Tried it but without success so far. She seems to have a few aliases too including Paige Madison and Paige York. Anyway, if I ever get on the same page as her if she is half as hot as the pics ill be happy :) .
 
Re: Review Alicia Privategirls

Agreed.

Btw Sandra Sunshine is back in town as just Sandra. Also with a higher tag of 550. I fucked her at 400 and I agree that is some of the best ass I have ever tasted. Smokin hot model body.
 
Re: Paige Michaels

Replied to her by e mail and just spoken to her on phone; sounds hot and talks a gr8 service-will find out when i see her tomorrow !! Hope pics are real....
 
The first industry night @ the players lounge will be in January the 24th.

It's a Tuesday, so no yoga classes:laughing4




AlexandraSilk said:
Hi MaryAnne
Love the idea of meeting other industry members.
However, Tuesday nights would suit me better. Monday nights I am at Yoga. Though I guess I could attend Industry night after yoga.
Did you have a time in mind MaryAnne?
Click to expand...
 
If there is a need for a compliant male body on which to demonstrate new techniques and innovations please let me know.
 
On a recent visit to Alex Silk - I shaved the 'rude' bits !!!

Needless to say, when i go back i know the way she likes the clients who see her...LOL

My knees are still wobbling
 
Thanks all for your replies.

I'm also an 'A' - I'd rather quality over quantity any day, such as a nice apartment, lingerie, shower & bed, not having to meet other punters in the hallway and so on.

For me around $400 is the right pricemark.

Cheers All.
 
Agree the extra bucks buys the private shower and the girl with the posh conversation, but don't agree the actual body-to-body bit is necessarily that much better. I seem to find the more expensive they are, the more it is about them than about me, so 2 by $200 would be my choice - but I'd be selective, as always.
 
Option A has always proven to be the most reliable. In terms of the most satisfying outcome at the time and events you remember when daydreaming long after.
 
I think from the threads and discussions in the past concensus is option A...and I strongly agree.
 
sexnut said:
Option: Invest in the stock market and make $1000. Keep on investing until have plenty of money for many hour punts with many girls...:occasion14
Click to expand...

Try Padbury Mining (PDY )Sex Nut there come down quite a lot and now on the up, $400 : 00 might me worth risking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top