I was one of those they came for, 8 years after it happened. I was hell pissed, as if they had a problem, why wait 8 years to rectify it. I was among those who put my name to a class action against DHS. They dropped their claim but said I was ineligible for a settlement due to being at fault to start with. I left it as that as this meant they were no longer all over me.Sounds like Scott Morrison, Centrelink and the failed Robodebt system which accused people of getting their income wrong. They had to prove their innocence. Later Morrison Govt apologised and there was a settlement. But some accused people committed suicide over this.
Burden of proof should be on them but when it comes to the govt, you're guilty until you prove your innocence. And even then, you're still guilty.I was one of those they came for, 8 years after it happened. I was hell pissed, as if they had a problem, why wait 8 years to rectify it. I was among those who put my name to a class action against DHS. They dropped their claim but said I was ineligible for a settlement due to being at fault to start with. I left it as that as this meant they were no longer all over me.
I can't believe what the West publishes. In the latest update on PP the West disclose the street address of the East Perth place but not the number. Surely this is the Matt from Matts Crew?If Matthew Slinger is indeed Matt FFC
Did the media refer to Matt's flat as a brothel? The only brothel in East Perth I can think of is 140 Edward Street, aka I-300 back entry.I can't believe what the West publishes. In the latest update on PP the West disclose the street address of the East Perth place but not the number. Surely this is the Matt from Matts Crew?
This might interest some
Their District Court of WA trial was told the apartment served as both Mr Slinger’s home and business premises. On a busy week, it hosted about 140 clients, with the 50-year-old taking a 30 per cent cut of the earnings.
Yes they did refer to it as a brothel. Shows how The West gets details wrong. The court referred to it as an apartment. Btw Edward Street was not the street name disclose by The West. It was named in the thread below (PP does not allow exact addresses, so I thought that rule applied here).Did the media refer to Matt's flat as a brothel? The only brothel in East Perth I can think of is 140 Edward Street, aka I-300 back entry.
Apparently it is near William Street. Some of the ladies' photos look like they were taken in the alleyways between Hay and Murray Streets near William Street.Yes they did refer to it as a brothel. Shows how The West gets details wrong. The court referred to it as an apartment. Btw Edward Street was not the street name disclose by The West. It was named in the thread below (PP does not allow exact addresses, so I thought that rule applied here).
There are other threads on this crew
At one time Matt had a 2nd address in Perth CBD with more girls there.
I had heard about them but never knew anything, found this so helpful thankyouI not accusing anyone but there has been talks about these 2 crews thats easily would be if not already on big brothers radar and I surely don’t want to be caught in the mix.
As for drug and alcohol use while providing a service is definitely a no go for me.
Matt has so many girls on his records he probably does have a 2nd spot. Ask yourself this, Matt has more girls than Blair's Crew cause it appears Matt will accept just about any girl whereas Blair will not.Apparently it is near William Street. Some of the ladies' photos look like they were taken in the alleyways between Hay and Murray Streets near William Street.
Blair and I have sense to not hire ladies fresh out of school (or in matts case just finishing year 8- I know a few women who can attest this)Matt has so many girls on his records he probably does have a 2nd spot. Ask yourself this, Matt has more girls than Blair's Crew cause it appears Matt will accept just about any girl whereas Blair will not.
I have posted the truth multiple times on PP but always quick to delete because they’re scared of legal ramifications. I understand that but when there’s an open child sex trafficking case against someone and you’re warning people of a potential predator, or potential place where they could accidentally be seeing an underage girl, you think they would keep it up..I remember a woman coming on PP from SW union or advocate support group or something like that, investigating alledged claims about a male manager mistreating his girls. I also remember pp punters naming the alledged under age girls (they studied their social media accounts). But pp admin cause of legal reasons are quick to delete or modify these posts.