You think its hot!
- Thread starter Demon
- Start date
Sensual ~ Vanessa
Gold Member
- Points
- 0
Yeah I think its hot 
the difference with the sun these days,
Is...it burns instantly, 10m in the sun and you will easily turn into
a lobster, slip, slop, slap people's
actually forget that, stay indoors
the difference with the sun these days,Is...it burns instantly, 10m in the sun and you will easily turn into
a lobster, slip, slop, slap people's
actually forget that, stay indoors
W
WRXXXR
We've got it pretty good really.
I feel sorry for those at the mines where it gets really hot and they have to wear long pants and sleeves. That'd be warm.
It's the humidity which I hate.
I feel sorry for those at the mines where it gets really hot and they have to wear long pants and sleeves. That'd be warm.
It's the humidity which I hate.
Demon
Legend Member
- Points
- 0
Long pants and sleeves are cooler, because they keep the sun off your skin.
But, yes it is hotter away from the coast and up north. Mines and farms.
The day it was 46 in Perth, it was 47 in Albany, and I remember the ABC weather guy saying that Albany's record max was higher than Perth's (most people thinking that albany was never as hot as Perth.
But, yes it is hotter away from the coast and up north. Mines and farms.
The day it was 46 in Perth, it was 47 in Albany, and I remember the ABC weather guy saying that Albany's record max was higher than Perth's (most people thinking that albany was never as hot as Perth.
S
sexnut
I should be doing stuff to get ready for the year but too hot
S
Saige
So I have a theory...what do you think??? When I squirt someone recently commented I must get dehydrated as I lose so much fluid..and in this heat I havre found what normally makes me squirt (and trust me was REALLY turned on) I did not nor did I get a wet as I normally do...could this be dehydration from the heat???
S
sexnut
Could be. What is this thing that makes you squirt?
J
JasRob
Yes its immensely hot these days..Its because of this global warming thing
Demon
Legend Member
- Points
- 0
So, how do you explain that these records are only the hottest since ... (i.e. sometime in the recent past was hotter.)?
Also, the computer models they use to predict the future, don't even explain the present climate.
Just 200 to 500 years ago it was hotter. We are coming out of a min-ice age. So hotter is 'normal'.
A
Alecia the Foxx
It is a fact that climate change spikes have been far more frequent in the last century.
Demon
Legend Member
- Points
- 0
You will also notice that the climate fraud scientists only mention the ice at the North Pole.
Ice in Antarctica is increasing (and that is where most of the world's ice is).
I believe that climate changes all the time, but humans have a miniscule effect.
If the pollies and others who believe in human caused climate change were consistent they would not be encouraging more humans, but less. Population has increased from 1 billion in 1900 to 7 billion in 2012. What explains the hotter periods before 1900 with so many less humans?
In 1500s England's weather was as warms as south of France and Italy, Greece and Spain. That is why England became a European power. Best climate in Europe for agriculture. Scandinavia was also warmer.
Ice in Antarctica is increasing (and that is where most of the world's ice is).
I believe that climate changes all the time, but humans have a miniscule effect.
If the pollies and others who believe in human caused climate change were consistent they would not be encouraging more humans, but less. Population has increased from 1 billion in 1900 to 7 billion in 2012. What explains the hotter periods before 1900 with so many less humans?
In 1500s England's weather was as warms as south of France and Italy, Greece and Spain. That is why England became a European power. Best climate in Europe for agriculture. Scandinavia was also warmer.
Demon
Legend Member
- Points
- 0
There is a lot of money to be made from promoting the human caused climate change. But little money from saying the opposite.
As one of my economics profs said "You can buy any opinion you want if you pay enough".
It was a course in Economics and Politics. He won a Nobel Prize in Economics for his work in that field.
As one of my economics profs said "You can buy any opinion you want if you pay enough".
It was a course in Economics and Politics. He won a Nobel Prize in Economics for his work in that field.
A
Alecia the Foxx
They ARE encouraging less humans, Demon. Population reduction/control is a huge part of greenie policies.
Happy2
Legend Member
- Points
- 22
No one can deny we are polluting the atmosphere But is it just us? As demon has said we have seen extremes on this planet before and we will again
We have been studying the climate for so short a time we dont know how long a climate cycle is meant to be. We are making a lot of assumptions
I would listen a little harder If the global warming side Would listen to the "Sceptics"
rather than shout every one elses views down instantly Wasn't scepticism a healthy word in science once?
We have been studying the climate for so short a time we dont know how long a climate cycle is meant to be. We are making a lot of assumptions
I would listen a little harder If the global warming side Would listen to the "Sceptics"
rather than shout every one elses views down instantly Wasn't scepticism a healthy word in science once?
Demon
Legend Member
- Points
- 0
Australia pays $5,000 for every baby born. The pollies, their policies and the media are encouraging more kids, not less.
Howard and Costello's infamous 'one for Mum, one for Dad, and one for the country'. The current labor govt has further increased the payment.
Doesn't sound like population control.
Only China has real population control, and look at the outcry by most people about China's one-child policy.
Demon
Legend Member
- Points
- 0
I hate the word 'sceptics' being used when the scientific fraud is pointed out.
'Sceptics' is a PR spin word to kill debate. Debate only needs to be killed if the side wanting debate killed (settled science argument) have a weak, or poor, or fraudulent, argument.
At the time of Galileo the settled science was that Aristotle had solved everything, and any further debate was to be killed.
'Sceptics' is a PR spin word to kill debate. Debate only needs to be killed if the side wanting debate killed (settled science argument) have a weak, or poor, or fraudulent, argument.
At the time of Galileo the settled science was that Aristotle had solved everything, and any further debate was to be killed.
A
Alecia the Foxx
I don't know what Australia's policy's regarding this are. I will have to check them out. I don't have a problem with China's population control policy. I also find that it's the skeptics who shout everyone down.
J
jaxonjorja
Very few like The Greens and their policies!
A
Alecia the Foxx
Which has got what to do with it?
J
jaxonjorja
Demon
Legend Member
- Points
- 0
'Sceptics' = playing the person, instead of the policies.
People who play the person do so because their arguments are fraudulent. If arguments are valid, they focus on the case at hand.
Always an easy way to tell if a case is valid. Play the person if argument is false or weak.
This is not a reference to anyone on this forum. But to the climate change industry.
People who play the person do so because their arguments are fraudulent. If arguments are valid, they focus on the case at hand.
Always an easy way to tell if a case is valid. Play the person if argument is false or weak.
This is not a reference to anyone on this forum. But to the climate change industry.
A
Alecia the Foxx
I didn't think you were a sceptic?
You thought correctly Jaxon. ;D I am definitely not a skeptic.
J
jaxonjorja
They ARE encouraging less humans, Demon. Population reduction/control is a huge part of greenie policies.
Your original post at around 11:43am this morning. They can have the policies, but if nobody likes them or their party, fat lot of good they are!
J
jaxonjorja
I also find that it's the skeptics who shout everyone down.
My mistake, obviously
ccasion14
A
Alecia the Foxx
Well, clearly China likes them and their policies, as they have population control measures in place, as well as other measures which I won't go into on here, because of the time factor. Considering how many people there are over there, I think your statement that nobody is into the greens policies is incorrect. Saying that "nobody" likes them is just the same as you criticising my use of the word "always."
And - excuse me, I like the Greens and their policies and I am not "nobody."
T
Top Dogg
It's hot as scaffolding I tell ya that
Demon
Legend Member
- Points
- 0
The United Nations celebrated the 7 billionth human late last year.
There was not comment that the population explosion is harming the climate.
Considering that the UN has been a big promoting of the climate change industry, lne would expect it not to celebrate this 'disaster' but to promote population control.
Most countries in the world are promoting larger populations, and I know of no religion which is promoting population control.
There was not comment that the population explosion is harming the climate.
Considering that the UN has been a big promoting of the climate change industry, lne would expect it not to celebrate this 'disaster' but to promote population control.
Most countries in the world are promoting larger populations, and I know of no religion which is promoting population control.