K
kindcolourwolf
Is this her?
Link is broken, so taken down.
Are her pics really her?
Is she still around??
Last edited by a moderator:
Is this her?
Link is broken, so taken down.
Are her pics really her?
You dudes have got to remember, you can't expect us to put our worst photos up. We put our best photos up. So, in all probability, it should be expected that we will look a LITTLE different from out photos. It's when the girl looks a LOT different that it should be looked on as a problem, but only then. And if punters are that pedantic, GO TO A BROTHEL AND PICK FROM A LINE UP!! Simple really.
specialist74 said:Does anyone know who the escort is? I thought privategirls had started verifying the photo's and details are correct.
My comment wasn't aimed at you, Darthron. Pointing out that someone who is 40 is not 20 as advertised is not pedantic. Bait and Switch, maybe?
...I'm aware PrivateGirls hosts independant escorts and their contacts - it's not an escort company, so again I'm probably in the wrong by naming them because they're not responsible for an escort being unreliable...
Does anyone know who the escort is? I thought privategirls had started verifying the photo's and details are correct.
....correct, Darthron.
The PG website only provides a vehicle through which WLs advertise themselves. Other than paying for advertising space, there is no other arrangement (eg employment, engagement etc) between the WL and PG. How a WL interacts with clients is a matter between the WL and the client and does not involve PG.
Fudd![]()
True, but with one addition: PGs offers a verification service. I don't know whether it was PGs or the actual escort who was to blame for verifying false information and those pictures, but in any case let's hope both sides get their act together.