Would there be a reason for a WL to go bare when it has never been discussed.

[JayPerez1977]

Just curious if this has ever happened before that the lady would forgot the use of condoms

 

[Deleted member 49173]

forgot ?? I'm not sure that actually happens. its a choice , so , deliberate act , IMO
.. by both/all on the scene.

 

[MikeB]

Just curious if this has ever happened before that the lady would forgot the use of condoms

Not that I share their logic but in discussions on the issue, some ladies suggest that some have a latex allergy or an allergy to some lub that is used even on non latex condoms.

In their minds, they feel their risk of an allergic reaction is higher and more immediate if exposed either to a latex condom or a wrong lube (that they don't either control or have explicit information about from the dom packet/manufacturer) than the risk they see from an STI or unwanted pregnancy.

As I indicate, not necessarily infallible, to some this logic is the driver perhaps.

 

[AmeliaKennedy]

No idea.. I wouldn't do it I have an issue with latex but I would rather have a little latex irritation than an STI! Stis don't show immediately or at all and some take up to 10 weeks to show up on a test so I wouldn't be risking it regardless!!!

Trust is one thing.. but either party might not even realise they have something yet as undetected and then that's not going to be fun.

 

[Hadrick]

WL are often loverly ladies running their own business. They tell you that your special and make you feel good, but at the end of the day if they are not using protection with you then most likely you are sharing what ever Sti their client base has with you!

 

[Hadrick]

I had one great night with a WL who made it clear a rubber was not needed as we were genuinely getting on and having a nice time. Doubly sure I put one one!!! Only takes one slip and it can be life changing in the wrong way!

 

[JayPerez1977]

Not that I share their logic but in discussions on the issue, some ladies suggest that some have a latex allergy or an allergy to some lub that is used even on non latex condoms.

In their minds, they feel their risk of an allergic reaction is higher and more immediate if exposed either to a latex condom or a wrong lube (that they don't either control or have explicit information about from the dom packet/manufacturer) than the risk they see from an STI or unwanted pregnancy.

As I indicate, not necessarily infallible, to some this logic is the driver perhaps.

I know of a lady that has a latex allergy and has latex free condoms... So I wouldn't think of that as an excuse.

 

[AlwaysUp]

Just a humble opinion, if it ain't on, it's ain't on.

If he or she is willing to try it on, you will get whatever village disease that's going around.

 

[Uncle Bobby]

I wouldn’t ever even let a girl suck me off without a Condom,
So many go to do it without asking also, it’s still risky!

 

[stevecool2015]

No condom no sex including oral

 

[John_Doe]

I would find it hard to believe anybody could forget, or that it could occur without being communicated or noticed unless the customer was blind.

 

[phred333]

Happened to me without being communicated, very nice body to body, transitioning to body in body. Wouldn't say it was not noticed, but took a little while to be sure. Not OK at all, but at least she took me home for dinner afterwards.

 

[JayPerez1977]

Same except the dinner time, even after a repositioning kept going. I just wondering why would it be done. On the other hand it was a repeat visit.