• Lots of naked NEW Members on the forum plz add an AVATAR we are adding them if you don't if you don't like change them.

King Charles has a love child!?

Goodstuff36 Bon truc in french

Goodstuff. Bon truc in french
Legend Member
Points
335
Still rember Shane Warne and the African girl that tried the lover thing on him.
Shane warne replying that he did not slept with her or even met her the media got rid of her quickly.
although won't do the same with the royal family.
 

1steelrod

Diamond Member
Points
107
Outback trucker or the outback fucker . Obbie. .
But you are still King of you own domain.
I wouldn't want to be in that situation. He is just a bastard child . With no real legal rights to the royal Throne only the porcelain throne where he can sit n shit and wonder if only his mother was not a Aussie slut . Oh well That's life as some one once said before they swung him from his neck.
 

Mrs Langtrees

Owner & Creator
Foundation Member
Points
959
As if the royal family will let anything happen to the heir to the throne... Pfffttttttt... If they can brush Prince Andrews antics under the rug, I reckon they could get away with murder... ;)
It is more complicated than that its their duty, as the Queen & Prince Charles have proved. Prince Charles himself will think of the boy regularly and have a passionate love for him also remmber mum kept it secret for over 20 years so Charles found out about after he could have no influence.
 

ozwarlock67

Legend Member
Points
81
Still rember Shane Warne and the African girl that tried the lover thing on him.
Shane warne replying that he did not slept with her or even met her the media got rid of her quickly.
although won't do the same with the royal family.


Who would want to say Shane Warne sired them?🤮🤮
 

Mariah

HellsfuckingBelle
Silver Member
Points
0
It is more complicated than that its their duty, as the Queen & Prince Charles have proved. Prince Charles himself will think of the boy regularly and have a passionate love for him also remmber mum kept it secret for over 20 years so Charles found out about after he could have no influence.
Err.... not sure about that one!
 

Mrs Langtrees

Owner & Creator
Foundation Member
Points
959
Did you know Genghis Kan DNA is in 3% of the worlds asian population today...Genghis was pretty faithful to his main wife, he wasnt a root bag... she sired 12 sons and it was them and the grandsons that had the 200 strong harems that caused this to happen they were the spreeders of the DNA
 
D

Deleted member 49173

As if the royal family will let anything happen to the heir to the throne... Pfffttttttt... If they can brush Prince Andrews antics under the rug, I reckon they could get away with murder... ;)
they did get away with murder ..
.Princess Di
 

lonelyman

Gold Member
Points
0
Bullshit it was an accident and should of the mother of a future king been in that car I think not.
I'm curious. Why shouldn't she have been in that car? She was out on a date. If anything, the French police should have provided a police escort to keep paparazzi away.
 

1steelrod

Diamond Member
Points
107
I am watching the Queen's funeral.
Long live the Queen.
May she rest in peace.
The world is better for her .
God Bless Her Majesty.
 

1steelrod

Diamond Member
Points
107
She stopped England from ever invading another country again then started giving back the countries to their own people. Its not this Queen who gave orders to invade any other country in the past 70 years only the Government.

This Wonderful Mother and Grandmother. Has stood firm for the people and her family like any other good woman would do .
If you looked at her history she's been the best monarch. She has not had any heads chopped off. Or any indiscretions to bring her name to any crime.
Let's look at the Phillipines. Or Thai royal families they have lots to answer for. The Saudi Prince just has a man murdered by his hench men . Japanese royalty won't even let a woman rule as a Queen . There is no heirs to the Throne now.
So really. You should be thankful we have a Female Queen instead of a self interested Man Monarch for the past 70 years as the world has changed for the better under this Queen.
 
Last edited:

lonelyman

Gold Member
Points
0
She stopped England from ever invading another country again then started giving back the countries to their own people. Its not this Queen who gave orders to invade any other country in the past 70 years only the Government.

This Wonderful Mother and Grandmother. Has stood firm for the people and her family like any other good woman would do .
If you looked at her history she's been the best monarch. She has not had any heads chopped off. Or any indiscretions to bring her name to any crime.
Let's look at the Phillipines. Or Thai royal families they have lots to answer for. The Saudi Prince just has a man murdered by his hench men . Japanese royalty won't even let a woman rule as a Queen . There is no heirs to the Throne now.
So really. You should be thankful we have a Female Queen instead of a self interested Man Monarch for the past 70 years as the world has changed for the better under this Queen.
1."She stopped England from ever invading another country again then started giving back the countries to their own people."

She did? When? How? England has no real military might to speak of and it has plundered colonies including Australia for a long time. And not returned any treasures it plundered apart from a few. It still hasn't returned the Cullinan Diamond to the Africans nor the Koh-i-noor to the Indians. The Royal Family did boycott the Falklands war victory ceremony but that didn't stop their son from taking part in it.

2. "Has stood firm for the people and her family like any other good woman would do ."
Really? How? Lots of beggars in the street and people who can't even afford heating. "Any good woman would do"? Sexist much?

3. "She has not had any heads chopped off."
No, the Queen can not have people executed. The nobility even less so. The death penalty has been abolished in the UK since 1998, and is also forbidden by the European Convention on Human Rights since 2004. But even before that, it's just a complete misunderstanding of the modern UK monarchy to think that the Queen could do that.

4. Let's look at the Phillipines. Or Thai royal families they have lots to answer for. The Saudi Prince just has a man murdered by his hench men . Japanese royalty won't even let a woman rule as a Queen . There is no heirs to the Throne now.

Phillipines - no King or Queen. Elected Heads of state. "Thai Royal families lot to answer for" Like what? As for the others - so what? Let their people decide.

5"You should be thankful we have a Female Queen instead of a self interested Man Monarch for the past 70 years as the world has changed for the better under this Queen."

The world? The world!!! Really????? No thanks. I know what to be grateful for. Good luck to you.
 
Top