I have to agree with Contrarian
Now - the issue of degrading. I think one way as a criteria would be "How would I feel if that's my sister or mother being portrayed?". It suddenly takes on a whole new perspective doesn't it?
And then you may well ask, "if it's not good enough to degrade my sister or mother then why is it okay to degrade someone else's?". Secondly, we need to ask ourselves if a woman would feel uncomfortable about that. And if that organization has women in it - then that needs to be catered for. "Boys will be boys" is too easy a cop out.
The article states
"There are victims of this group's alleged behaviour who have been denigrated in different ways," he said.
"Some through texts, some through distortion of imagery, some through the distribution of material without consent."
Would you want your sister or mother to be harassed in the work place?
Would you like it if your sister or mothers image was distorted and sent around for everyone to comment on?
Lastly what if your sister or mother was filmed having consensual sex, and then it was uploaded or emailed to men without their knowledge?
Now what you get up to in your own home is entirely up to you, but once you start to disseminate those items through email and text to work colleagues etc, your looking for trouble.
Its' also an entirely different matter as I see it, if someone chooses to produce media with that content in it, providing they do so willingly and approve it to be disseminated to the public.
Now if they sent items through there WORK computers, emails and phones, well then that's just STUPID